Manipur had just about started to recede to the periphery of consciousness with a scaling down of violence when bloodletting erupted again earlier this month with several brutal killings and widespread arson in Jiribam and Imphal. It was clear the mistrust between the two warring communities has spread its roots deep and wide, and cessation of violence can only be temporary only to return at the slightest trigger. The violence that erupted in May 2023 between the Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities has left the state in turmoil, with hundreds of lives lost, thousands displaced, and a deepening divide along ethnic lines. The ongoing unrest has brought Manipur into the national spotlight, exposing not only the fragile socio-political fabric of the region but also the failure of both the state and central governments to address underlying issues.
ALSO READ: Editorial | Not Specialised
The crisis was triggered by a series of factors, including long-standing ethnic tensions, disputes over political representation, and demands for separate administrative setups. The Meitei community, which constitutes the majority population in the Imphal Valley, has been advocating for inclusion in the Scheduled Tribes (ST) category, which would grant them certain affirmative action benefits. In contrast, the Kuki-Zo tribes, who predominantly reside in the hill districts, have expressed concerns over the potential loss of their special privileges if the Meiteis are granted ST status. These demands and counter-demands have exacerbated existing animosities, resulting in widespread violence.The impact of this conflict has been devastating. Homes have been burned, businesses looted, and entire villages displaced. The violence has not only affected the lives of ordinary citizens but has also disrupted daily life, education, and healthcare services. The situation has raised critical questions about the role of the state and central governments in maintaining peace and ensuring the safety of all communities.
Manipur’s political landscape is marked by complex ethnic and community dynamics. The Meiteis, who dominate the valley and are predominantly Hindu, have historically held economic and political power. In contrast, the Kuki-Zo, who are predominantly Christian and live in the hill districts, have often felt marginalised. The state’s governance structure, divided along ethnic lines, has made it difficult to formulate policies that are inclusive and address the concerns of all groups. The demands for greater autonomy from the hill districts, coupled with fears of losing rights to the indigenous people, have only deepened the sense of alienation among different communities. The state government’s inability to address these grievances and its heavy-handed response to protests have worsened the situation. Additionally, the central government’s delayed intervention has allowed the violence to escalate unchecked. The crisis in Manipur is a complex issue, deeply rooted in ethnic tensions, political exclusion, and historical grievances. However, it is not insurmountable. The path forward requires a concerted effort from the state and central governments, as well as active participation from all communities involved. Only through dialogue, cooperation, and a commitment to justice can Manipur emerge from this crisis stronger, more unified, and more peaceful. The government must act swiftly, but also with care and empathy, to rebuild trust and create an inclusive future for all the people of Manipur.
