Editorial | Dilemma Over Children's Access To Social Media

The digital age presents a paradox for parents—how to regulate their children’s exposure to social media without depriving them of its benefits. The Supreme Court’s decision to dismiss a PIL seeking a ban on social media for children under 13 highlights the complexity of the issue. While the court rightly left the matter to policymakers, the larger question remains unanswered: how can society strike a balance between responsible digital engagement and the risks of overexposure?

ALSO READ: Editorial | Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2024 Raises Constitutional Questions

In today’s world, social media is not just a platform for entertainment but also a tool for learning, social interaction, and awareness. Denying children access altogether may leave them digitally handicapped in an increasingly tech-driven world. However, unrestricted exposure comes with its own perils—mental health concerns, cyber bullying, addiction, and exposure to inappropriate content.

The solution lies not in outright bans but in a well-regulated approach. Parents must play an active role in monitoring their children’s online activities, setting screen-time limits, and educating them about responsible digital behaviour. Schools can integrate digital literacy programs to help children navigate social media safely. Meanwhile, tech companies and policymakers should work together to implement stricter age verification processes and content moderation to create a safer online environment for young users. The debate over social media’s impact on children is far from over. However, rather than seeking judicial intervention, a collaborative effort among parents, educators, and lawmakers is the need of the hour to ensure a balanced and healthy digital upbringing for the next generation.