The recent ceasefire between Hezbollah and Israel, following weeks of escalating violence, marks a critical juncture in the volatile landscape of the Middle East. Although the ceasefire has temporarily halted the fighting, it raises fundamental questions about the broader implications for regional stability, the future of Hezbollah’s role in Lebanon, and the complex dynamics between Israel and its neighbours. This fragile peace, if it holds, could have significant ramifications for the geopolitics of the region, including the balance of power between Iran-backed groups and Israel, the state of Lebanese sovereignty, and the overarching security concerns of neighbouring nations.
ALSO READ: Editorial | Lessons To learn
The terms of the ceasefire, while not fully disclosed, appear to have brought a halt to the direct military confrontations. However, there are reasons to remain sceptical about its long-term viability. Both parties retain underlying grievances and the region is still home to numerous volatile factors that could reignite hostilities at any moment. For Hezbollah, the ceasefire may be a tactical pause, allowing the group to regroup and resupply, while for Israel, the ceasefire may provide the temporary breathing room needed to focus on its broader security strategy, particularly in Gaza and the West Bank. Moreover, the ceasefire is fragile because it does not address the underlying causes of the conflict, such as Hezbollah's weaponization, its role as a proxy force for Iran, and Israel’s concerns over its northern border. In fact, the ceasefire could be viewed as merely a tactical lull in a larger, ongoing struggle for dominance and security in the region.
As the dust settles from the ceasefire, the focus must shift to the long-term prospects for peace. The international community must increase diplomatic pressure on all parties to engage in meaningful dialogue and seek a broader resolution to the conflicts. In the short term, the ceasefire is a welcome reprieve, but without addressing the root causes of the conflict, the region remains on a knife’s edge.
