“An unexamined life is not worth living.” This bold claim by Socrates, the ancient Greek philosopher, still resonates today. Known for asking questions that challenged assumptions and provoked deep reflection, Socrates believed dialogue was the path to truth. In ancient Athens, he roamed the streets, engaging anyone willing to converse. But what if Socrates lived in the digital age? Instead of bustling marketplaces, he would find himself in the virtual agora of social media—a chaotic, noisy, and polarising space where millions of conversations unfold daily.
ALSO READ: Opinion | Tackling Child Sexual Abuse: A Call For Immediate Action
Would Socrates thrive here, or would he despair? The philosopher who valued wisdom above all might find a world more focused on likes than logic, on shares than substance. Social media undeniably shapes our collective consciousness, but are we using it wisely? Are we asking the right questions, or have we surrendered to superficiality?
From Athens to Algorithms: Socrates Meets the Digital Age
Imagine Socrates scrolling through Twitter. He’d encounter trending debates, quick opinions, and hashtags. A man who spent hours probing a single question would face the challenge of 280-character arguments. For Socrates, truth wasn’t a destination but a process—rigorous and often uncomfortable. Social media, however, often prioritises speed over depth.
Platforms reward brevity, wit, and controversy at the expense of nuance. Complex issues— climate change, gender rights, political divides—are reduced to provocative “hot takes.” Socrates would challenge this culture of instant reactions, asking: Are we engaging critically, or just reacting? Are we seeking understanding, or signalling virtues?
Echo Chambers: Comfort vs. Wisdom
Socrates claimed wisdom came from knowing what you don’t know. But in today’s world, algorithms make this harder. They feed us content based on preferences, creating echo chambers where beliefs are reinforced rather than questioned.
Take political discourse on platforms like Facebook or X (formerly Twitter). Users encounter posts that validate their worldview, distorting reality and vilifying opposing perspectives. Socrates would ask: Are we seeking truth or just comfort? Are we willing to face the discomfort of doubt?
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the dangers of echo chambers. Misinformation about vaccines and treatments spread rapidly. A Socratic approach—scrutinising beliefs and sources—could have been a powerful tool to combat this.
From Dialogue to Monologue: The Lost Art of Listening
Socratic dialogue required patience, empathy, and listening. Social media, by contrast, often feels like a series of monologues. Users broadcast thoughts without meaningful engagement, and comment sections devolve into arguments.
The rise of influencers underscores this shift. While many share insights, the focus often shifts from dialogue to performance, aiming for attention over understanding. Socrates would likely ask: Are we connecting or competing? Are we listening or just waiting to speak?
Platforms like Reddit’s “Ask Me Anything” sessions offer hope, enabling open-ended discussions that reflect Socratic inquiry. They prove that meaningful conversations are possible, even in noisy digital spaces.
Intellectual Humility: Socrates’ Missing Legacy
Perhaps Socrates’ greatest lesson for today is intellectual humility. In a world where everyone has a platform, admitting ignorance feels like weakness. Yet Socrates’ wisdom was rooted in “I know that I know nothing.”
This humility is essential for tackling today’s challenges. Climate change, for example, demands collaboration across disciplines, yet public discourse often oversimplifies. Socrates would urge us to acknowledge what we don’t know and seek diverse perspectives.
Consider the debate around artificial intelligence (AI). While some see it as a panacea, others warn of its risks. Socrates wouldn’t claim expertise but would insist on asking the right questions: What are AI’s ethical implications? Who benefits, and who bears the risks? Are we prioritising human well-being, or is profit driving innovation?
The Allure of Appearances: Living Authentically
Socrates warned against sophists, who prioritised persuasion over truth. Today, social media is rife with modern sophistry. Influencers and advertisers craft curated personas, projecting success, beauty, or virtue. This focus on appearances can lead to “bad faith,” denying our true selves to conform to societal standards.
Socrates might ask: Are we honest with ourselves online? Are we chasing likes at the expense of integrity?
The pressure to conform has real consequences. Platforms like Instagram contribute to anxiety and depression, as users compare themselves to idealised images. Socratic questioning could help individuals reflect on their motivations and redefine their relationship with social media.
A New Socratic Method: Bringing Philosophy Back to the Feed
Social media may seem antithetical to Socratic values, but it holds potential for meaningful dialogue. Platforms like YouTube and podcasts have become spaces for in-depth discussions. Thought leaders like Dr. Jordan Peterson and Dr. Cornel West engage audiences with debates that echo Socrates’ commitment to questioning.
Movements like Black Lives Matter and Fridays for Future show how social media can amplify voices and drive change. These successes stem from asking profound questions:
What kind of world do we want? What does justice look like? What can we do to make a difference?
Socrates’ legacy reminds us that the approach matters more than the platform. By bringing curiosity, humility, and a commitment to truth into online interactions, we can transform social media from a battleground into a space for growth.
The Courage to Question
Socrates lived and died for the belief that truth is worth pursuing, even when uncomfortable. In today’s digital age, his wisdom is more relevant than ever. Social media offers opportunities to connect, learn, and share, but it also tempts us with distractions and superficiality.
The question isn’t whether social media is good or bad but whether we’re using it wisely. Are we engaging in Socratic dialogue, or are we trapped in echo chambers? Are we seeking understanding or appearances?
Ultimately, the choice is ours. As we navigate the digital agora, we have the power to make it a space for meaningful inquiry and connection. The only question that remains is: Are we willing to ask the right questions?
(The author is a government official. All views and opinions expressed are the author's own.)