GUWAHATI: The amended Waqf Bill, which was referred to a joint parliamentary committee in August 2024, is set to be introduced in the Lok Sabha on April 2, according to media reports. The proposed legislation has faced significant opposition in the past, and senior BJP ministers are expected to engage in discussions with leaders of the India Bloc before its presentation in Parliament.
ALSO READ: 3620.9 Sq Km Of Assam’s Forest Area Under Encroachment: Union Environment Ministry
With the ongoing Budget session concluding on April 4, the bill must secure approval from both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha to become law. The legislation aims to overhaul the governance structure of Waqf boards, which oversee properties designated for religious and charitable purposes within the Muslim community. However, the bill has sparked political controversy, with opposition parties condemning it as unconstitutional and discriminatory.
The Union Cabinet recently approved the bill after considering recommendations from the joint parliamentary committee, paving the way for its discussion in Parliament. Originally introduced in the Lok Sabha by Union Minister Kiren Rijiju, the bill was sent to the committee in August 2024. Although the parliamentary panel passed the report by a majority vote, 11 opposition MPs dissented and submitted objections. The comprehensive 655-page report was presented to both Houses of Parliament earlier this month.
On Monday, Rijiju reaffirmed the government's commitment to tabling the bill, accusing certain political parties and groups of misleading the public and inciting unrest over its provisions. "Some groups, particularly political figures, are spreading falsehoods about the Waqf Amendment Bill. I urge them to read the bill thoroughly instead of misinforming people. While democracy allows freedom of speech, attempts to mislead the public are unacceptable," he stated. He also hinted at identifying groups allegedly involved in misinformation.
The bill continues to fuel political debate, with critics labeling it unconstitutional, while government officials defend it as essential for ensuring transparency and preventing the misuse of Waqf properties.
